Dark Sky Preservation

Named by a model · tracked across 4 meetings · officials-only aggregation · supplements the official record

Light Pollution ControlNight Sky ProtectionAstronomical Lighting Regulationdark skiesskiesdarkcheckscompliantvalidmanner

☉ follow by RSS

the long view — every meeting this issue touched

2025-12-09Select Board1 moment(s)

3:15:30 not. Um, enabling force of Dark Skies by

2026-05-12Select Board11 moment(s)

4:21:01 return of a dark skies related bylaw 4:21:11 committee to address dark skies that 4:22:59 until we get a dark skies bylaw through 4:23:06 the dark skies bylaw to come forward.4:23:42 to the to the dark skies piece of it,4:23:55 it comes to dark skies. So, we we hear

📄 Agenda Packet — SB Packet 5.19.26 V11p.21 · approved by both the Select Board and Parks & Rec Commission, ensuring community

2026-06-30Select Board9 moment(s)

3:45:56 let's talk about dark skies, dark sky 3:46:55 talk about dark skies. And all of a 3:48:12 voters seemed to be we want dark skies 3:48:17 a broader dark skies policy and so it 3:48:29 dark skies I think our response to you 3:49:04 dark skies work focus on that. Um

2026-10-06Select Board3 moment(s)

3:01:12 dark skies compliant lighting um, sort 3:04:19 conversation that there is no dark skies 3:07:59 here? Is there a dark skies compliant

said alongside it — the phrases in the same breath

compliant lighting 2

counted in every line the record filed under this issue and the line either side; its own names are left out, and so is any other name the record does not already list — a name is known by its capitals, so one made only of everyday words can slip through, and a phrase with a word the record has rarely heard is held back too; each opens the record’s search for the phrase within the issue’s own meetings